Skip to content

Something urgent? Call us now! (852) 3416 1711

Courts ushering in the digital age

By Arthur Chan

Hong Kong, 7 July 2022: A notable consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic is that the world has embraced digital technology at an even faster pace than before. Video conferencing, remote working and online learning have become the new normal for many people.

This phenomenon is extending – belatedly, some may argue – to Hong Kong’s legal system. After enduring irregular court closures since the beginning of 2020, exacerbating a backlog of cases and compromising timely access to justice, the Judiciary is taking positive steps to implement digital solutions in our courts.

Since April 2020, courts have conducted more than 1,000 remote hearings as part of civil cases. However, a three-month public consultation is now underway for the Courts (Remote Hearing) Bill which, if passed, would allow the use of remote hearings for some criminal cases. As well, it proposes extending such arrangements to the Competition Tribunal, Labour Tribunal, Small Claims Tribunal and Coroner’s Court, among others. Further, the Bill introduces new offences regarding the unauthorised recording of hearings.

Many legal professionals have long argued that Hong Kong lags behind other jurisdictions where telepresence solutions have been used in the courts for many years. BC&C’s Senior Partner Colin Cohen highlighted this issue in an opinion piece published in March 2020 before my colleagues Allison Lee and Claire Chow underscored in an article some three months later how Hong Kong was being forced to play catchup in this fast-evolving field.

At present, there are legal impediments that prevent most criminal cases from being heard remotely. While there are no obvious legal obstacles regarding civil proceedings, there remains a glaring absence of express provisions setting out how a remote hearing should be handled.

As the consultation paper explains, the Bill seeks to provide a comprehensive legal framework concerning the application, operation and effect of remote hearings. It provides a clear legal basis for judges and judicial officers to order remote hearings at various levels of courts and tribunals, with all factors considered, while acknowledging the overriding needs for open justice and fair hearings. Major features of the Bill include:

  • Details of the making of a remote hearing order;
  • Operation and legal effect of remote hearings;
  • Safeguards for open justice.

The Judiciary says it is planning an incremental approach by excluding certain proceedings, such as criminal trials, from the application of the Bill at its initial stage. Among the types of hearings omitted from the first phase will be death inquests and jury trials.

Further, the Bill proposes certain parts of criminal cases should always take place in person: when a defendant appears before a magistrate for the first time; or when the accused is required to make a plea, hear the verdict or receive their sentence.

For the avoidance of doubt, the consultation paper states physical hearings should remain the courts’ “default mode”. The court will allow a remote hearing “only if it is fair and just to do so” and taking into account relevant considerations, including the complexity and urgency of the proceedings and the views of the parties.

Part 5 of the Bill concerns new offences and penalties created to safeguard the integrity of both physical and remote hearings. The paper acknowledges that remote hearings in particular may be susceptible to unauthorised recording and publishing. To achieve a strong deterrent effect and maintain parity between both types of hearing, the Judiciary proposes the introduction of two new offences.

Anyone who records a hearing, in either audio or visual (photographic or video) format, without permission would face a maximum fine of HK$50,000 and imprisonment of up to six months. A person who publishes such recordings – whether live-streaming or post-event – would be liable to a maximum fine of  HK$100,000 and a jail term of up to five years. The paper points out that note-taking is presently permitted and will continue to be allowed.

In summary, the Courts (Remote Hearing) Bill is a welcome – if overdue – piece of legislation which introduces sensible and practical alternatives to physical hearings. The measures are not only efficient and cost-effective, the overall result is enhanced access to justice.

Arthur Chan has been an Associate with BC&C since 2018. He deals with Criminal Matters while also covering Civil and Commercial Litigation and handles cases involving personal injury and employment issues. He can be contacted at Arthur@boasecohencollins.com.

37+ years of legal experience is just a click away.

Friendly and approachable, we are ready to answer your questions and offer you sound advice.

Contact us now

BC&C-contact-us

News & Knowledge

Learn more about what we do and what we say. Subscribe to our newsletter to ensure you receive our updates.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

My return to primitive thinking

Hong Kong, 17 August 2022: In the classic 1974 fantasy film The Land That Time Forgot, a World War I German U-boat crew and their American captives veer off course in the South Atlantic and end up in Caprona, an uncharted subcontinent populated by dinosaurs and ancient tribes. Their reaction is one of amazement: how […]

Read more

Covid triggers employment law changes

By Allison Lee  Hong Kong, 8 August 2022: Significant changes to Hong Kong’s employment regulations have been made to address workplace-related issues as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.  Employers now have scope to dismiss a member of staff who refuses, without a valid excuse, to be vaccinated. As well, employees who fail to attend […]

Read more

Flight to HK cancelled? Read this …

By Pádraig Seif Hong Kong, 2 August 2022: One direct effect of the government’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic is that living in Hong Kong has been somewhat of a challenge since early 2020. Especially if you need to travel. Maybe the following sounds all too familiar to the esteemed reader: flights into Hong Kong […]

Read more

Law & More: Episode 17 – Amanda Whitfort

Hong Kong, 1 August 2022: In the latest episode of Law & More, we focus on the law relating to animal welfare with our guest, Professor Amanda Whitfort. A barrister and university lecturer who has co-authored major reports on animal welfare, Amanda discusses Hong Kong’s outdated laws, issues surrounding cruelty and neglect, and major problems […]

Read more

A timely boost for common law

By Arthur Chan Hong Kong, 29 July 2022: In a landmark ruling, the Court of Final Appeal has overturned Hong Kong’s first conviction for carrying zip ties. The judges ruled that lower courts had erroneously applied the law too widely, meaning anyone found carrying an instrument deemed fit for unlawful purpose could be penalised for […]

Read more