Skip to content

Something urgent? Call us now! (852) 3416 1711

Data privacy vs public health needs

Data privacy vs public health needs

With tracking and tracing of potential Covid-19 cases playing such a vital role in Hong Kong’s fight against the pandemic, the city’s privacy watchdog has reminded employers about appropriate use of personal data. Boase Cohen & Collins Associate Allison Lee and Trainee Claire Chow examine the guidelines.

Hong Kong, 22 June 2020: The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data of Hong Kong (the “Commissioner”) recently published guidelines to draw employers’ awareness to the collection and use of personal data in the current public health situation.

The Commissioner, Stephen Wong, acknowledges that there is a legitimate basis for employers’ assistance to control the spread of the coronavirus by collecting additional employee’s personal data. At the same time, he reminds employers that the data collected must be “necessary, appropriate and proportionate to the purpose to be achieved”.

Under the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (“PDPO”), exemptions are provided for in situations of public health emergency.

1. Section 59(1) of the PDPO provides that personal data relating to the physical or mental health of the data subject is exempt from the provisions of either or both of data access requests (Data Protection Principle 6 and section 18(1)(b) of the PDPO) and restriction on data protection (Data Protection Principle 3) in any case in which the application of those provisions to the data would be likely to cause serious harm to the physical or mental health of the data subject or any other individual.
2. Section 59(2) further provides that personal data relating to the identity or location of a data subject is exempt from the provisions of data protection (Data Protection Principle 3) if the application of those provisions to the data would be likely to cause serious harm to the physical or mental health of the data subject or any other individual.

The Commissioner sets out various important points in the guidelines, including:-

1. For the purpose of protecting public health and/or the health of their employees, it is generally justifiable for employers to collect temperature measurements and request travel data from employees who have returned from overseas.
2. For the purpose of tracking down and treating the infected, it is generally also acceptable for employers to disclose the identity, health and location data of employees to the government or health authorities.
3. Proper and strong digital security should be in place to safeguard the transfer and use of documents and data when employees have to work from home during the pandemic.
4. Employers should be transparent and explain the proposed measures to be taken to safeguard the employee’s health.

In issuing the guidelines, Mr Wong stresses: “The public health and safety of the community in times of the pandemic remains our primary concern. We should be mindful of the compelling public interests in the current public health emergency when considering compliance with data protection laws, which should not be seen as hindering the measures taken in fighting or combating the pandemic especially when the collection and use of personal data is in the public interest and/or in the interest of public health.”

For clarity, the Commissioner states that personal data collected by employers for combatting Covid-19 must not be used or disclosed for other unrelated purposes, unless voluntary consent is obtained from the individuals concerned or exemptions under the PDPO apply.

He also says that if an employee unfortunately contracts Covid-19, the employer may notify other employees, visitors, the property management office and other interested parties without disclosing personally identifiable information of the infected. For example, it is generally sufficient for the employer just to issue a notice with information that it has staff infected. Under most circumstances, disclosure of the name and other personal particulars of an infected employee in the notice will not be considered as necessary or proportionate.

To summarise, in the time of a pandemic, protecting public health emerges as the absolute right. However, with the increasing awareness of data privacy rights, employers should understand their legal obligations and continue to comply with all personal data protection principles. They should take proactive measures to ensure the safety and health at work of employees.

DataHealth PHOTO

The coronavirus pandemic has posed data privacy concerns for employers and staff alike.

40+ years of legal experience is just a click away.

Friendly and approachable, we are ready to answer your questions and offer you sound advice.

Contact us now

BC&C-contact-us

News & Knowledge

Learn more about what we do and what we say. Subscribe to our newsletter to ensure you receive our updates.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Surveillance guidelines a welcome move

By Alex Liu Hong Kong, 22 December 2025: Complaints about video surveillance are on the rise as more individuals and companies in Hong Kong install CCTV systems on their premises. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) has received some 200 complaints this year – with 80% of these relating to disputes […]

Read more

A net loss for some as parents fret

Hong Kong, 17 December 2025: Several years ago, Indian handwash brand Godrej Protekt did a marketing stunt, putting up “Do Not Touch” signs next to a variety of outdoor objects – a just-painted park bench, dust-covered old car etc – and secretly videoing kids’ reactions. Of course, the curious youngsters did exactly what they were […]

Read more

Law & More: Episode 60 – Bill Ricquier

Hong Kong, 15 December 2025: In this episode, we meet renowned lawyer and academic Bill Ricquier, whose distinguished legal career has included spells in London and Liverpool before settling down as a long-term resident of Singapore. Aside from law, Bill’s other passion is cricket. Having fallen in love with the game as a schoolboy, he […]

Read more

A meaningful first step towards reform

By Alex Liu Hong Kong, 9 December 2025: As recovery work continues following the Tai Po fire disaster, the government has acted with commendable speed in announcing that an independent committee, chaired by a judge, is being established to conduct a comprehensive review. The investigative body’s aim will be to facilitate systematic reform of the […]

Read more

Law & More: Episode 59 – Julia Charlton

Hong Kong, 4 December 2025: In this episode, we meet corporate finance lawyer Julia Charlton, a hugely respected and vastly experienced legal practitioner in Hong Kong’s financial sector. Julia looks back on her career journey, beginning with her upbringing in the northeast of England, practicing corporate law in London, and her bold decision as a […]

Read more