Skip to content

Something urgent? Call us now! (852) 3416 1711

A timely boost for common law

By Arthur Chan

Hong Kong, 29 July 2022: In a landmark ruling, the Court of Final Appeal has overturned Hong Kong’s first conviction for carrying zip ties. The judges ruled that lower courts had erroneously applied the law too widely, meaning anyone found carrying an instrument deemed fit for unlawful purpose could be penalised for what amounted to a “thought crime”.

The top court acquitted property agent Chan Chun-kit, who had been jailed for five and a half months after being found in possession of plastic fasteners during the 2019 civil unrest. It said giving the law such a broad interpretation would mean almost all articles or instruments could be considered suitable for illegal use.


Chan was arrested on 2 November 2019 after being stopped by police near the scene of clashes at Victoria Park in Causeway Bay. Like many protesters at the time, he was dressed in black, and officers found 48 zip ties in his backpack.

He was charged under Section 17 of the Summary Offences Ordinance (Cap. 228), which seeks to penalise “any person who has in his possession any wrist restraint or other instrument or article manufactured for the purpose of physically restraining a person, any handcuffs or thumbcuffs, any offensive weapon, or any crowbar, picklock, skeleton-key or other instrument fit for unlawful purposes, with intent to use the same for any unlawful purposes”. The law was first passed in 1844 and has been subjected to legislative amendment and judicial interpretation in the many years since.

At his trial, Chan did not offer an explanation for having the zip ties, but the presiding magistrate concluded he must have intended to use them to build makeshift roadblocks. The defendant was duly convicted and sentenced. At the Court of Appeal, he insisted he had planned to use the ties for moving office and argued that the prosecution had failed to prove an unlawful purpose, but the verdict was upheld.

CFA judgment

In their unanimous ruling, the Court of Final Appeal declared the Court of Appeal had mistakenly applied a blanket interpretation to the phrase “other instrument fit for unlawful purposes”. The top court held the wording should be limited to just three types of item: an offensive weapon, an instrument for gaining unlawful access, or something manufactured for physical restraint. Zip ties did not fall into any of these categories.

The judges held that the Court of Appeal’s approach was contrary to the legislative intent of restraining the scope of the provision. “In other words, under this construction, Section 17 is in reality a thought crime, depending on what a defendant’s intent was at the material time subject to proof. There is simply no warrant to suggest that this was the legislative intent,” wrote the CFA judges.

The CFA also rejected the government’s argument that the court should examine the Chinese version of Section 17 as it gave clarity as to “how to reflect the legislative intent” when compared to the English version. It said the Chinese translation “cannot affect the correct interpretation of the section” and it did not “faithfully” follow the English text.


Chan remains the only citizen to be convicted and jailed solely for being in possession of zip ties. However, some individuals have been sentenced for carrying such fasteners alongside other offences, so there will be ramifications for other cases. We are likely to see a number of appeals.

In the wider context, the ruling underscores Hong Kong’s common law traditions, the long-standing legal principle of restricting the scope of legislation and ensuring the law is applied equally and fairly. It serves as a reminder of the enduring excellence and independence of the city’s Judiciary.

Arthur Chan has been an Associate with BC&C since 2018. He deals with Criminal Matters while also covering Civil and Commercial Litigation and handles cases involving personal injury and employment issues. He can be contacted at

37+ years of legal experience is just a click away.

Friendly and approachable, we are ready to answer your questions and offer you sound advice.

Contact us now


News & Knowledge

Learn more about what we do and what we say. Subscribe to our newsletter to ensure you receive our updates.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A reminder about wage obligations

By Alex Liu Hong Kong, 29 November 2022: The impact of Covid-19 on Hong Kong’s economy has been underscored by media stories about firms failing to pay wages on time and falling behind with pension fund contributions. But even in these difficult times, the government has made it clear employers are expected to meet their […]

Read more

BC&C duo are admitted as Solicitors

Hong Kong, 28 November 2022: There were scenes of celebration outside the High Court in Admiralty on Saturday as Nicole Chong and Kyle Ho became the latest talented legal professionals with Boase Cohen & Collins to be admitted as Solicitors in Hong Kong. Family, friends and work colleagues were on hand to share their landmark […]

Read more

Kicking Covid thoughts into touch

Doha, 23 November 2022: Brazilian football icon Pele popularised the phrase “the beautiful game” – o jogo bonito in his native Portuguese – although its exact origin is unclear. He had every reason to love his chosen sport: one of the finest players of all time, he won the World Cup on three occasions. His […]

Read more

Equality drama reflects real life

By Gabriella Chan Hong Kong, 17 November 2022: The staging of an acclaimed play, We Are Gay, at the West Kowloon Cultural District’s Xiqu Centre last week coincided with another landmark moment for Hong Kong’s LGBTQ+ community. While the drama – a highlight of the 2022 Hong Kong Arts Festival – was being acted out […]

Read more

Gabriella Chan enhances BC&C team

Hong Kong, 10 November 2022: We are pleased to welcome experienced lawyer Gabriella Chan to Boase Cohen & Collins as a key addition to our Family Law team. Gabriella, who joins as an Associate, is proficient in a range of matters arising from the matrimonial context, including divorce and separation, children and financial applications, committal […]

Read more